In support of Stupak
By Michael H. Babcock, DMG WriterArticle Photos
HOUGHTON - On Friday afternoon, members of the Respect Life Committee of the Holy Family Catholic Church held a press conference outside of the City Center in downtown Houghton to celebrate the work of U.S. Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Menominee, as he worked to get an amendment to the health care bill, which could be voted on today.
The amendment would prevent plans in the health insurance exchange from covering abortions.
"We're thanking him because for the last several months, he's been trying to get this to the floor," said Roland Mayer, who organized the conference. "We feel very strongly in support of Stupak's effort."
Mayer spent Sept. 11 in Washington D.C., where he talked with Stupak about the health care plan.
"The fact that he's a Democrat makes it that much more impressive, because he's voting pro-life," Mayer said.
Unfortunately for Stupak and the group who was present Friday, Stupak's efforts may fall short.
"Tomorrow the bill will include abortion, mandated taxpayer funds for abortion," Mayer said. "(President Barack) Obama said there will be no federal funds for abortion, but unless the bill specifically excludes abortion, the courts will interpret 'reproductive services' to include abortion; that's been proven in history since 1973."
Cecelia Warren was one of the crew from Ontonagon that was present Friday.
"I'm a pro-life person and Bart has been fighting for trying to get the abortion part out of this bill, and he needs our help," she said. "People have been quiet for too long."
Michael H. Babcock can be reached at mbabcock@mininggazette.com.
|
CussinJack
|
|
|---|---|
|
11-09-09 12:29 PM
|
The health bill that passed was no win. 220-215? That basically means 1/2 the country is going to be ticked. That's no win. And a 2,000+ page document? Who can possibly know what all's in there? America needs serious health care reform ... total overhaul of how it's paid for, how services are delivered, serious cost control, and care for all. That takes 2,000 pages?
|
|
FreeCountry
|
|
|
11-09-09 10:35 AM
|
This is a shell game. Stupak knows his language will be taken out if and when the Senate passes a bill and the two bills go to committee. This is a prime example of a " Reach around".
|
|
fishnfool
|
|
|
11-09-09 8:18 AM
|
Some people have WAY to much spair time, Eh?
|
|
Riutta1966
|
|
|
11-08-09 8:55 PM
|
Give up adventure You tried quote what the CONSTITUTION say in the to TrueMarxist! but TrueMarxist Will ignore the facts! He gets frustrated when he can't win against the Wisdom of our founding fathers!
|
|
adventure
|
|
|
11-08-09 7:00 PM
|
TruePatriot, so, because most people think that marijuana is bad, does that mean it's any worse than what's legal now? Obama was a constitutional professor at the university of chicago, yet he said that "the constitution is a charter of NEGATIVE liberties" I don't know, it seems to me that the liberties that the constitution protects are positive, not negative...wouldn't you agree? Besides, this "living document" theory didn't come around until approximately the 1930's. That's why congress couldn't just ban alcohol, they needed a constitutional amendment to do that. It's also why congress taxed, and not banned machine guns in 1934...because they knew a ban wouldn't stand a constitutional challenge. Why would we need to pass constitutional amendments if we could get everything done by passing general laws? So apparently, the guys who wrote the constitution, and their intent on what it was designed to be hold no weight to you.
|
|
adventure
|
|
|
11-08-09 6:47 PM
|
Secs. 2521 and 2533 (pp. 1379 and 1437) establishes racial and ethnic preferences in awarding grants for training nurses and creating secondary-school health science programs. So, if my income is low enough that I can't afford to buy into the governments "affordable" health care plan (which is currently the case), I'm going to be fined by the government. Since I'll be unable to pay that fine, I'm going to be sent to prison.....nice work. I guess the Democrats (and 1 republican) are really fighting for the little man!
|
|
adventure
|
|
|
11-08-09 6:44 PM
|
Sec. 1114 (pp. 391-393) replaces physicians with physician assistants in overseeing care for hospice patients. Secs. 1158-1160 (pp. 499-520) initiates programs to reduce payments for patient care to what it costs in the lowest cost regions of the country. This will reduce payments for care (and by implication the standard of care) for hospital patients in higher cost areas such as New York and Florida. Sec. 1161 (pp. 520-545) cuts payments to Medicare Advantage plans (used by 20% of seniors). Advantage plans have warned this will result in reductions in optional benefits such as vision and dental care.
|
|
adventure
|
|
|
11-08-09 6:43 PM
|
Sec. 1302 (pp. 672-692) moves Medicare from a fee-for-service payment system, in which patients choose which doctors to see and doctors are paid for each service they provide, toward what's called a "medical home." The medical home is this decade's version of HMO-restrictions on care. A primary-care provider manages access to costly specialists and diagnostic tests for a flat monthly fee. The bill specifies that patients may have to settle for a nurse practitioner rather than a physician as the primary-care provider. Medical homes begin with demonstration projects, but the HHS secretary is authorized to "disseminate this approach rapidly on a national basis
|
|
adventure
|
|
|
11-08-09 6:42 PM
|
Sec. 412 (p. 272) says that employers must provide a "qualified plan" for their employees and pay 72.5% of the cost, and a smaller share of family coverage, or incur an 8% payroll tax. Small businesses, with payrolls from $500,000 to $750,000, are fined less
|
|
adventure
|
|
|
11-08-09 6:42 PM
|
Sec. 59b (pp. 297-299) says that when you file your taxes, you must include proof that you are in a qualified plan. If not, you will be fined thousands of dollars. Illegal immigrants are exempt from this requirement.
|
|
adventure
|
|
|
11-08-09 6:41 PM
|
Sec. 303 (pp. 167-168) makes it clear that, although the "qualified plan" is not yet designed, it will be of the "one size fits all" variety. The bill claims to offer choice—basic, enhanced and premium levels—but the benefits are the same. Only the co-pays and deductibles differ. You will have to enroll in the same plan, whether the government is paying for it or you and your employer are footing the bill
|
|
adventure
|
|
|
11-08-09 6:41 PM
|
Sec. 224 (p. 118) provides that 18 months after the bill becomes law, the Secretary of Health and Human Services will decide what a "qualified plan" covers and how much you'll be legally required to pay for it. That's like a banker telling you to sign the loan agreement now, then filling in the interest rate and repayment terms 18 months later.
|
|
adventure
|
|
|
11-08-09 6:41 PM
|
Here's what the house passed: Sec. 202 (p. 91-92) of the bill requires you to enroll in a "qualified plan." If you get your insurance at work, your employer will have a "grace period" to switch you to a "qualified plan," meaning a plan designed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. If you buy your own insurance, there's no grace period. You'll have to enroll in a qualified plan as soon as any term in your contract changes, such as the co-pay, deductible or benefit.
|
|
TruePatriot
|
|
|
11-08-09 6:40 PM
|
The constitution, by most constitutional scholars opinions, is a living document. To say it isn't; is wrong. The courts spend alot of time reviewing laws and ect to see if it fits within the framework of the Constitution.
|
|
Riutta1966
|
|
|
11-08-09 6:00 PM
|
In one note We have laws on the books to keep crooked wall street in check But we never enforce them same as immigration! Since both sides never enforce them! We get radical Gov't again both sides! We over tax Co's it forces them to move overseas Even Honest Co's it results loss of jobs and Health Ins from Co's! The Dems & some Reps who supported the health care reform! They don't want to hear the real facts that some of us don't want to buy health insurance! so they add them as part of their reform bill claiming they can't afford it, but we chose not buy insurance!
|
|
adventure
|
|
|
11-08-09 5:49 PM
|
"The government of the United States is a definite government, confined to specified objects. It is not like the state governments, whose powers are more general. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government.” -- James Madison
Now, show me where they intended for it to be a "living document" that you claim it to be.
|
|
Riutta1966
|
|
|
11-08-09 5:46 PM
|
let them get treated & detain them & send them back what country they came from! It will deter the Illegals going to emergency rooms save tax payers $$ & make the hospitals lower the cost of care since Illegals stopped going to emergency rooms for treatments & it will prevent passing the cost to Health Ins co's Well Illegals get free treatment it forces hospitals to increase the cost of care & it affect the Ins Co's!! And why Should we Include Illegals to get coverage on this so called healthcare bill? Why should we include people who is too cheap to get health Ins? meaning they got the Bucks! Why should lazy people get it too? they never work! why should we pay for Illegals, cheap people & Lazy people! it would*****tax payers $$ dry!
|
|
adventure
|
|
|
11-08-09 5:44 PM
|
“A wise and frugal government … shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government.” -Thomas Jefferson “Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, BUT ONLY THOSE SPECIFICALLY ENUMERATED.” -Thomas Jefferson “With respect to the two words ‘general welfare,’ I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators.” -- James Madison
|
|
adventure
|
|
|
11-08-09 5:39 PM
|
CussinJack and TruePatriot, show me where the founding fathers intended the Constitution to be a living document. They did provide an avenue to change it if need be, and that is by a constitutional amendment. “To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it.” -- Thomas Jefferson
|
|
Riutta1966
|
|
|
11-08-09 5:36 PM
|
Why don't they just make it Few pages short instead of close to 2000!In simple short terms 1. allow people buy Insurance over the state lines It will increase competition lower the cost 2. Force The insurance Co's to cover the cost of care that you have Depending what plan you got from Cheap to Expensive! Force the Ins Co to cover the cost of emergency room cost, Except for the stupid little thing like I have a tiny little cut on my pinky stuff like that! 3. Make sure there is no fine print when you purchase insurance! Everything must be detailed from what plans you get cheap to expensive stating what is covered or not covered and how much you pay rest out of pocket! if any depends on plans you purchase! 4. force Ins Co. to cover cost of plastic surgery that you got in a bad auto accident or whatever it may be as long its health issue! as an example! 5. If the gov't does enforce our Immigration laws post BP or ICE agents in emergency rooms
|
|
CussinJack
|
|
|
11-08-09 9:02 AM
|
I don't think we should necessarily get into a Constitutional debate in the DMB blog, but I have to agree with TruePatriot's description of the "general welfare" clause. It certainly isn't obvious to me that health care reform is unconstitutional. We have such a hodge-podge mess of health care financing in this country -- both capitalist and socialist. The VA is socialist as ironic as that sounds. Of all the world's developed democracies, the USA has the highest health care costs per person yet we rank below all the others in care for all. We are the ONLY country that allows corporations to make a profit off the pain of others. We do not have the finest health care system in the world. Japan, France, Germany, Austria, Canada, and Britain beat us. The current bill from what I've learned is not the answer either. We need health care for all with all paying as they are able. No one should go bankrupt because they get sick.
|
|
TruePatriot
|
|
|
11-08-09 6:36 AM
|
Adventure, the constitution is a living document. The general welfare clause in it provides the government basis for ensuring it's citizens live a more healthy, prosperous, and longer life. RabbitKiller, you have no idea what true socialist is. All capitalist governments have elements of socialism such as military's, police forces, road commissions, and ect. I don't believe in government owning companies that make products but I do believe the government should run the health delivery system and get rid of companies that are only in it for the profit. Just like I would hate to see fire departments as profit driven companies.
|
|
adventure
|
|
|
11-08-09 12:44 AM
|
CussinJack, Socialism IS taking from those who have, and giving to those who have not. So, technically, this bill isn't socialism. It takes from everyone, the rich (higher taxes) and the poor (fines/penalties/jail for those who can't afford affordable healthcare). What this bill clearly is, is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Article 1 sec 8 of the CONSTITUTION tells us what the federal government CAN do. Nowhere does it say to imprison people and fine them if they don't have health insurance, in order to give others health care coverage. Read what the founding fathers intended, including about the "general welfare" clause. You will see that this monstrosity that is the U.S. Federal government is NOT what they intended.
|
|
CussinJack
|
|
|
11-07-09 8:07 PM
|
RabbitKiller -- Do you ever actually read anything or do you get all you "news" and opinions from Faux News? Label something "Socialist" and that's all you need to know. Don't confuse you with the details or the facts, eh?
|
|
favorite
|
|
|
11-07-09 4:01 PM
|
If the health care bill is such a great idea, why is congress exempting itself from it provisions?
|





