Cooperation needed with Iran
Short of war, the possibilities for forcing Iran to abandon its nuclear weapons program appear to be very limited.
Tehran's fanatic leaders may even welcome armed conflict. As we have seen in the recent past, during the war between Iran and Iraq, the mullahs do not hesitate to sacrifice lives by the millions when it suits their whims.
Congress reportedly is preparing a package of economic sanctions against Iran - the only practical approach, it seems.
But sanctions by the United States, or even a coalition of most major nations, will not work unless virtually all of the international community joins in to help.
Frankly, we doubt that such cooperation can be achieved. Again, recent history is illustrative: Embargoes against Iraq, called for by the United Nations during the 1990s, were full of holes.
That was because some countries, including France and Russia, continued doing business with Baghdad.
Until and unless firm, reliable commitments from at least the major powers - and that includes Russia and China - can be obtained, U.S. officials should not impose sanctions on their own, or with help from countries such as Great Britain.
Ineffective economic sanctions against Iran would do more harm than good - and could lead to war.
President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton should make it their top priority to obtain the necessary cooperation.
|
upfinndian
|
|
|---|---|
|
10-30-09 3:26 AM
|
Article title should read"Coup needed in Iran" I'm pretty sure someone could organize a mass "death to America" rally any day of the week over there, but I was impressed with how their youth stood up to the tyrants after their election,sad you could never expect as much out of the deceived youth of this country. We have Iran surounded, Israel should go in, on it's own ,and clean house Israel will fight if need be for their right to exist, whether we help them or not
|
|
buckskin
|
|
|
10-23-09 3:34 PM
|
There is only one way to go on this subject. The real question is will it be sooner or later.
|
|
lostmyshovel
|
|
|
10-23-09 11:41 AM
|
Israel will have to wait. They don't want Iran to have a nuclear weapon but even more they don't want to lose the security of knowing that the U.S. has their back. Thank goodness Obama has sent the signal that we won't necessarily be Israel's lapdog anymore, or else Israel would have plunged us into World War III last spring. They are our most dangerous ally.
|
|
RabbitKiller
|
|
|
10-22-09 9:13 PM
|
I guess most yoopers can't even find Iran on the map so they don't know how to comment on this editorial.
|
|
RabbitKiller
|
|
|
10-21-09 1:38 PM
|
Israel will not wait. They can't afford to. Would we be talking nice to nice Chavez if he were developing nuclear weapons capable of hitting the US?
|





